K. M. Munshi
- Shri K. M. Munshi :REPORT ON MINORITY RIGHTSSCHEDULEMay I say one word about this? There seems to be some amount of confusion on this point. If you will look at the Report itself, the position will be made…
- Shri K. M. Munshi :REPORT ON MINORITY RIGHTSAmendment No. 24 by Pandit Thakurdas Bhargava relates to Eastern Punjab to which I have moved an amendment (No. 3) just to carry out the intention of the…
- Shri K. M. Munshi :REPORT ON MINORITY RIGHTSSir, I move the amendment which says:— “That in amendment No. 2; of list I, dated 25th August 1947, for the words(c) of para 3 for the word ‘Seats’ the…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi (Bombay : General) :REPORT ON MINORITY RIGHTSMr. President, Sir, the amendment moved by my Honourable friend, Mr. Khaitan was moved only with a view to state that the case of West Bengal may be…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :REPORT ON MINORITY RIGHTSCLAUSE 6Does the Honourable the Mover of the amendment wish to move the amendment or is he going to withdraw it?
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :REPORT ON MINORITY RIGHTSCLAUSE 8I rise to a point of order. This is a Minority Committee’s report and we are only dealing with minorities and not States.
- Mr. K. M. Munshi:REPORT ON MINORITY RIGHTSCLAUSE 12Sir, this is a report by the Advisory Committee to the Constituent Assembly, and not a draft report to be adopted by the Constituent Assembly itself.…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :REPORT ON MINORITY RIGHTSCLAUSE 12Mr. Maitra says, “What is there to show that the House has considered the report ?” A resolution was formally passed that the House do consider the…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :REPORT ON MINORITY RIGHTSCLAUSE 12The decisions have been accepted in part, have been amended in part, and the report has been before the House. My point of order is that there cannot be…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi (Bombay: General) :REPORT OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY FUNCTIONS COMMITTEEI move the Resolution which stands in my name. The paragraphs of the Resolution which I seek to move are almost in the words of the Report, except one or…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :REPORT OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY FUNCTIONS COMMITTEEI will read it out certainly. I am much obliged to the Honourable Member for drawing attention to this and I stand corrected. My motion stands as…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :REPORT OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY FUNCTIONS COMMITTEEMay I point out that the day after tomorrow is a holiday and Members are anxious that the Assembly should close tomorrow ? The day after tomorrow is a…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi (Bombay: General) :SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS— (Contd.)CLAUSE 16Sir, that will enlarge the meaning. The whole idea will be changed, it may mean a college, postgraduate school, or anything. The whole idea is that right…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi:SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS— (Contd.)CLAUSE 16Mr. President, Sir, my first proposition with regard to this Fundamental Right is that the words ‘Public Funds’ should be really ‘State Funds’. Mr.…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS— (Contd.)CLAUSE 16It is not a point of order, but a question. There are no lawyers set up there to consider whether this comparative Philosophy or elementary comparative…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS— (Contd.)CLAUSE 16The point is that there are schools which are intended to teach religion and every student who goes there is taught religion. Pathasalas are not strictly…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS— (Contd.)CLAUSE 16I want to know whether the Honourable Mover has accepted the word “recognised” in the place of “maintained”.
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS— (Contd.)CLAUSE 16Instead of ‘State funds’ it would be better to have It “recognised by or receiving aid from the State” because it cannot be recognised by State funds.…
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS— (Contd.)CLAUSE 16Are we debating the same thing over again? I think we have adopted it.
- Mr. K. M. Munshi :SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS— (Contd.)CLAUSE 16Sir, it is not correct to assume that the matter did not receive consideration at the hands of the Advisory Committee or the original Fundamental Rights…